I heard this on KPFA on the drive in this morning -- it's rare that I do listen to KPFA during
my commute because it does tend to go off track in its commentary.
The rabid portion of the right has jumped over Moyer's speech, and PBS in general.
Listening and reading the comment in it's entirety, I can't find any point at which the
speech is wrong or shows bias. This is exactly the sort of commentary that a patriot
and an American would make. It's the sort of thing that a middle-school child in the 60s
would aspire to in an essay on the flag. It's exactly what any Boy Scout would believe.
The hate-mongering of the right and the ill-informed harpishness of Anne Coulter on this particular point
is shameful and embarassing. No American educated in the public school system should be displaying that
level of laziness in their analysis. Here's Moyer's speech:
I put the flag in my lapel tonight. First time. Until now I haven't
thought it necessary to display a little metallic icon of patriotism
for everyone to see. It was enough to vote, pay my taxes, perform my
civic duties, speak my mind, and do my best to raise our kids to be
good Americans. Sometimes I would offer a small prayer of gratitude
that I had been born in a country whose institutions sustained me,
whose armed forces protected me, and whose ideals inspired me; I offered
my heart's affections in return. It no more occurred to me to flaunt
the flag on my chest than it did to pin my mother's picture on my lapel
to prove her son's love. Mother knew where I stood; so does my country.
I even tuck a valentine in my tax returns on April 15.
So what's this flag doing here? Well, I put it on to take it back.
The flag's been hijacked and turned into a logo -- the trademark of
a monopoly on patriotism. On those Sunday morning talk shows, official
chests appear adorned with the flag as if it is the Good Housekeeping
seal of approval. And during the State of the Union, did you notice
Bush and Cheney wearing the flag? How come? No administration's patriotism
is ever in doubt, only its policies. And the flag bestows no immunity
from error. When I see flags sprouting on official lapels, I think
of the time in China when I saw Mao's Little Red Book on every official's
desk, omnipresent and unread.
But more galling than anything are all those moralistic ideologues
in Washington sporting the flag in their lapels while writing books
and running Web sites and publishing magazines attacking dissenters
as un-American. They are people whose ardor for war grows disproportionately
to their distance from the fighting. They're in the same league as
those swarms of corporate lobbyists wearing flags and prowling Capitol
Hill for tax breaks even as they call for more spending on war.
So I put this on as a modest riposte to men with flags in their lapels
who shoot missiles from the safety of Washington think tanks, or argue
that sacrifice is good as long as they don't have to make it, or approve
of bribing governments to join the coalition of the willing (after
they first stash the cash). I put it on to remind myself that not every
patriot thinks we should do to the people of Baghdad what bin Laden
did to us. The flag belongs to the country, not to the government.
And it reminds me that it's not un-American to think that war -- except
in self-defense -- is a failure of moral imagination, political nerve,
and diplomatic skill. Come to think of it, standing up to your government
can mean standing up for your country.
What do you think?
I love that image -- the flag being high-jacked and trademarked as a neo-con corporate logo.
Maybe that's been the source of my uneasiness with the loudly agressive patriotism I've observed.
Maybe it's because of decades of observing the quiet patriotism of service people, their widows and
the children left behind. Maybe it's because I've never felt a need to drag out the flag I got
when my father was buried in 1969 and wave it around to prove something.